Geographical distribution

So far, it is known that various places have yielded funerary cones with or without preserving their original locations.
In this page, I introduce all places, from North to South, at which cones were found, as well as their references.
- Naga ed-Deir
von Bissing 1926.
Im Jahre 1913 sah ich an den Gräbern des Neuen Reichs in
Naga ed Deïr neben einem Topf des Neuen Reichs etwa zehn mit
roter Farbe überzogene, unbeschriebene Grabkegel der üblichen Form
liegen; es sind m. W. die einzigen außerhalb Thebens und Abu Simbels
bisher in Ägypten nachgewiesenen.
- Abydos
Daressy 1926 [ASAE 26].
J'ai ramassé dans ce cimetière (Note: in Rizeiqât) un certain nombre de cônes
funéraires semblables à ceux de Gournah mais sans inscriptions; déjà à Abydos j'en avais remarqué quelques-uns:
l'usage de cet objet n'est donc pas spécial à la nécropole de Thèbes. J'en ai rapporté également
une table d'offrandes ronde en terre cuite, avec les aliments figurés en relief, et quelques autres
simulacres de provisions trouvés épars dans le sable.
- Dendera
Polz 2007: 269-272.
In der recht kursorischen Veröffentlichung des Saff-Grabes berichtet Petrie zwar nichts über den Fund von
Grabkegeln in oder an diesem Grab bzw. generell in dem von ihm ausgegrabenen Bereich der Nekropole. Allerdings konnte Di. Arnold bei Begehungen noch in den
Jahren 1966-68 bei diesem Saff-Grab Grabkegel des "undekorierten, 11.-Dynastie-Typ[s]" feststellen.
- Naqada
Arnold 1968: 35.
- Thebes (Luxor)
Lepsius 1849-1859:
259, 261, 284, 288; Virey 1891: 313; Wiedemann 1891 [PSBA 13]: 34; Loret 1892 [PSBA 14]: 209; Carter 1902 [ASAE 3]: 119; Carter 1903a [ASAE 4]: 47-48; Carter 1903b [ASAE 4]: 178; Mond 1904 [ASAE 5]: 98, 101, 103; Mond 1905 [ASAE 6]:
65, 91-96; Weigall 1906 [ASAE 7]: 132;
Northampton, Spiegelberg, and Newberry 1908: 14-15, Pls. 23-25; Gauthier 1908 [BIFAO 6]; Chassinat 1910 [BIFAO 7]:
156-161; Carnarvon & Carter 1912: 8-10, 22, 24, 26-27; Davies 1913a: 5, 30-31; Davies 1913b [PSBA 35]: 283; J. B. 1914 [BMMA 9]: 16; Davies and Gardiner 1915: 2; Davies 1917: 42; Gauthier 1919 [BIFAO 16]; Gauthier 1920 [ASAE 19]: 7, 9;
Davies 1923a: (Vol. II) 62; Davies 1923b: 21; Davies 1923c: 136; Bruyère 1924: 62; Davies
1926: 34; Yeivin, 1926 [AAA 13]: 13; Bruyère 1927: 17-18, 53-57; Mond and Emery 1927 [AAA 14]: 17, 23-24, 33; Mond and Emery 1929 [AAA 16]: 53;
Bruyère 1929: 17;
Bruyère 1934: 71, 89; Borchardt, Königisberger, and Ricke 1934 [ZÄS 70]: 26, 31; Bruyère 1937: 12, 63; Fakhry 1937 [ASAE 37]: 34-35;
Fakhry 1943 [ASAE 43]: 409-410; Davies & Faulkner 1947 [JEA 33]: 40. n. 3; Bruyère 1952: 44, 46; Bruyère 1953: 70, 83; Habachi 1958 [ASAE 55]: 332;
Heyler 1959 [Kêmi 15]: 87; Arnold and Settgast 1966 [MDAIK 21]: 83; Dabrowska-Smektala 1968 [ASAE 60]: 26, 130; Lipinska 1968 [ASAE 60]: 173-174; Arnold 1974 [MDAIK 30]: 157; Collins 1976 [JEA 62]: 32-36, 38-39;
Brack and Brack 1977: 73, 78; Guksch 1978: 40; Kunsthistorisches Museum 1979: 112-113; Brack and Brack 1980: 67-70; Habachi 1981: 112; Hegazy and Tosi 1983: 30;
Feucht 1985: 148; Beinlich-Seeber and Shedid 1987: 148-150; Mysliwiec 1987: 181, Taf. XXXII; Shedid 1988: 174, 184-185, 188; Manniche 1988b: 46; Heyes 1990: 35; Seyfried 1990: 181-187, 199, 205-206, 209, 212, 215, 225, 231, 237, 269, 274;
Assmann 1991: 243-244; Seyfried 1991: 91-93, 98, 102; Dziobek 1992: 113-115; Gaál 1993: 30, 120; Nasr 1993 [SAK 20]: 201-202; Ockinga 1993: 46; Redford and Redford 1994: 23; Gabolde et. al.1994 [BIFAO 94]: 180;
Dziobek 1994: 42, 60; Bosticco 1994 [Vicino Oriente 9]; Guksch 1995: 24-25, 120-121, 125, 178; Redford 1995 [KMT (6(1))]: 66, 68; Seyfried 1995: 85; Mostafa 1995: 76, 79;
Strudwick and Strudwick 1996: 4-5, 103-106, 113, 115-116, 120-121, 123, 126, 128, 130, 155; Kampp 1996: 507-508; Ockinga 1996: 70-71; Guksch 1997 [GM 158]: 9-13;
Leclant and Clerc 1998 [Orientalia 67]: 386; Strudwick 2000 [Memnonia 11]: 257; Leclant and Minault-Gout 2001 [Orientalia 70]: 433;
Bács 2002 [Studia Aegyptiaca 17]: 54; Kondo and Ishibashi 2002: 72-74, 84; Graefe 2003: (Text) 201-203; Kondo and Ishibashi 2003: 131-135, 178;
Ockinga 2003; Teeter et. al. 2003: 173-187; Strudwick 2003: 20-22; Polz 2003a [MDAIK 59]: 376; Polz 2003b [MDAIK 59]: 382, 384-385; Ockinga 2004: 2; Fábián 2005 [ASAE 79]: 43-44, 47;
Ockinga 2005: 2; Polz 2005: 5-6; Polz 2006a: 8; Polz 2006b: [ASAE: 80] 301; Betrò and Vesco 2006 [Egitto e vicino oriente 29]: 26;
Fábián 2006: 50; Redford 2006: 123, 125, 130, 139, 141, 145, 148, 151, 154, 158; Ishibashi 2007: 95-101; Galán and Borrego 2007 [Memnonia 17]; Polz 2007: 151; Smythe 2008; Tefnin & Bavay 2008 [ASAE 82]: 368; Dorn & Paulin-Grothe 2009 [GM 222]: 11; Polz 2009: 338-339; Kondo et al. 2010: 58-59; Budka 2010: 318, 735-736, 738-740; Shirley 2010: 285, 297 n. 52; Kondo et al. 2011: 55-56.
- Armant
Drower and Myers 1940: 101, Pl. 107.
- Rizeiqât
Daressy 1926 [ASAE 26]: 18. See 'Abydos' section above.
- Tod
Málek 1982: 428.
- Gebelein and Ed-Dêr
Sayce 1905 [ASAE 6].
At the north end of the burial-ground were traces of two tombs which
must have originally been the chief ones in the cemetery. On the northern side of them the ground had been filled with inscribed terra-cotta cones,
the first that have heen found outside Thebes, tho' uninscribed cones of the XIIth dynasty have been discovered at Rizagât and I have picked one up at
Gebelên. An Arab building has stood upon the spot, the foundations of which I excavated, and, in the old "kitchen- midden" of the building, I
found several of the cones and the fragments of an alabaster jar as well as of a terra-cotta coffin with hatched edge. A comparison of the various
cones which I collected gives the two accompanying inscriptions :
1. "The divine scribe, Aa-pehti".
2. "The divine scribe, priest (?) of the temple of Hathor, lady of Âg(e)n, Aa-neter".
The importance of these inscriptions lies in their giving the site of the city of Agn(i), which M. Daressy has conjectured stood near the modern
Matâ'na (Recueil de travaux relatifs à la philologie et à l'archéologie, X, 3-4, p. 140-141). It would appear that he is right, since the cemetery of
Ed-Dêr is opposite Matâ'na, and my enquiries elicited the fact that the old name is still preserved in that of the Wadi Gîn, into which the Nile-water
is pumped from Matâ'na, tho' it has been obscured by the map-makers who have changed Gîn into el-Ginn. The size of the cemetery shows that Agni
must have been an important place in the age of the XIIth dynasty, and as I discovered nothing later than that age it would seem that its place was
subsequently taken by Esna. As Hathor was worshipped there, we may conclude that it was the Aphroditopolis of the Greeks (Strabo 817). The
cones of Aa-pehti were large and painted white; those of Aa-neter were, on the contrary, small, hard-baked and unpainted.
- Kuban
Emery and Kirwan 1935.
They show us an example of # 535 of Davies & Macadam as one of the finds found at Kuban, though they wrongly translate the inscription as: 'Pen-Amen, Overseer of the seals of Bakit (?)' (Emery and Kirwan 1935: 50).
- Aniba
Marcks and Steindorff 1937: 187; Steindorff 1937: Taf. 35.
Aanu's cones (Davies & Macadam # 599 and # 607) were found at the place where his cenotaph is (Marcks and Steindorff 1937: 187; Steindorff 1937: Taf. 35)
- Abu Simbel
Edwards 2008: 113.
By shoring up the ground, however, they were enabled completely to clear the landing, which was curiously paved with cones of rude pottery like the bottoms of amphorae.
These cones, of which we took out some twenty-eight or thirty, were not in the least like the celebrated funereal cones found so abundantly at Thebes.
They bore no stamps, and were much shorter and more lumpy in shape.
As for the cones like the bottoms of amphorae, see 'Manufacturing methods'.
- Tombos
Funerary cones were discovered from TMB005/1 (Edwards and Osman 2001 [GM 182]) and from the tomb of Saamun and Uren (See # B.17-19 in 'Cones not listed on Davies & Macadam'; Smith 2003: 142-143).
- And also...
At Gaza, the Palestinian Department of Antiquities discovered 17 cone-like objects, out of their primary context (Steel, Manley, Clarke, and Sadeq 2004).
Though the place is far from Thebes and other places that yielded cones, the enigmatic objects look like cones in shape, size, and material.
Further, they have stamped inscriptions which read 'mn-xpr[w?]-ra (Thutmose III [IV?])' and 'mAat-kA-ra (Hatshepsut)'.
On the contrary, there also are some observations which differentiate them from the 'real' cones:
1. Real cones were not made for kings.
2. The 'cones' from Gaza have two inscriptions -one on the face and the other on the side.
Given these substantive similarities and differencies, excavators point out that these are not exact funerary cones, but are of similar function,
used in funerary context.
Given the above information, we can obtain an overview of the geographical location here.
I would like to thank Dr Lipkin and Mr Sakamoto for sharing their information with me.
Last updated on 6th Jan. 2012.
HOME
Copyright © The World of Funerary Cones